Monday, July 26, 2010

A country with a mission statement

It’s an enormous advantage for a country, as it is for an individual, to have a cohesive sense of itself, especially if there’s some set of representative values around which citizens can coalesce when times are hard. Pre-eminent examples of this phenomenon would be France and the United States: both born of revolutions at around the same time, and both profoundly attached to the notion of “liberty” – though with interestingly different connotations; for the French it’s inseparable from equality and social justice, while for the Americans it means above all untrammeled individual self-expression and self-development.

Of course the existence of this sort of national mission statement in no way eliminates bitter, even fratricidal and sororicidal conflict over its translation into social and political reality, but a country without a mission statement that also lacks a unitary ethnic identity can very easily fall apart altogether. Belgium, like so many other countries a by-product of war and of the dissolution of empires, is an example – and one need only look to Africa to find many other similar ill-contrived ethnic mash-ups, arbitrarily carved up by departing colonial administrators.

But there are some countries that don’t fit neatly into either of these categories, and Italy, where I’m currently on vacation, is one of the most interesting, attractive and compelling ones. Even the origins of the modern state are a matter of controversy: a sort of revolution against the various colonial, ex-colonial and quasi-colonial powers then ruling over Italy’s regions which morphed into an effective take-over by the rulers of the North-Western region of Piemonte. The cultural and ethnic coherence of the country is also a matter of debate – economic development and income levels are very uneven, and until fairly recently a majority of citizens spoke one of the many mutually unintelligible dialects at home rather than standard Italian. And in recent years a political party has emerged in the North which argues for the separation of Italy into two States, North and South; far from being a despised minority of head-banging extremists, these people are actually in government, as a key element in Berlusconi’s coalition.

The question of what Italy stands for and what it represents has become one of great importance and centrality; it is after all one of the world’s leading industrial powers and a member of the G7, and this commercial success has ensured until recently a good standard of living for most citizens and high levels of investment in public transportation, health and other services. In recent years, however, as Italy’s predominately small and medium-sized businesses have been seriously challenged by lower-cost competitors from Eastern Europe and Asia, economic growth has fallen to well below the levels of its European neighbours – and an ineffectual and dishonest government which is tolerated by some and profoundly detested by many others has done nothing to improve national morale. Living standards for the majority are steadily falling, as the individual and collective wealth built up over the past 50 years is slowly dilapidated, and jobs become scarcer and scarcer: large numbers of people in their 30s still live with their parents, unable to find permanent jobs well enough paid to buy or rent their own homes.

So Italy poses in a particularly acute form the question which we all face at the moment, irrespective of the rate of economic growth where we happen to live – is economic growth really all that nationhood and government are about? Italy offers an alternative answer to the question, blessed as it is with a unique and precious cultural heritage, exceptionally beautiful landscapes and a near-perfect climate (all of them significantly damaged by the breakneck race for growth of the past 60 years). We’ve all of us become blind to the beauty that surrounds us, prepared to destroy the heritage of centuries or millennia in exchange for a few more gadgets, another tank full of gas, a more powerful air-conditioner. Like all addictions, it’s unsustainable but also unstoppable – and the profits which this addiction gifts to huge corporations add an additional layer of compulsiveness and apparent inevitability. When the process starts to unwind, or stops altogether – what’s left? If you’re fortunate enough to live in Italy, a lot is left – everything that really matters, in fact – for those who have the eyes to see and the heart to love.

Perhaps a new Renaissance could emerge from this troubled country, a movement affirming the values of natural and created beauty and human love, friendship and solidarity, bringing light to a world which has lost its way; there are perhaps enough people here who believe it, and enough of a heritage to support it. That would be a mission worth following.

5 comments:

  1. It sounds like a wonderful country to visit. My wife went there just recently, but only "did" Venice and Rome, and they are overrun by tourists during this peak season. If I went I'd get out to the kinds of places shown in your wonderful photos.

    And yes, there are futures beyond profit and growth. They are not easy to see (nor to value) though, in this day and age, so overrun are we by consumerism.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This was a well-written post and touches on a fundamental challenge for all countries. I can see a grass-roots movement in the US that is probably going on in many countries. The young do not have the same value-laden desire for "things" that their parents had. We may very well see economies that will no longer be viable based on growth, but will have to find another way to survive. It is becoming clear to more and more people that living in that way is not only unsustainable, but undesirable. The New York Times did an article last week on a movement of young people (women, mainly) who have pledged to wear only six pieces of clothes for a month. Some have made the decision not to buy clothes for a year. True, this is a small percentage of people, but ideas grow in just this way. My own daughters eschew commercialism in many regards, choosing to live more simply. Maybe beautiful Italy will lead the way back to appreciating a different kind of beauty, one that doesn't walk the runway, or run on gas.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Marcus - yes you should try to visit Italy, though the theme is one which you see played out all across Europe: the right balance between cultural and personal values and one's material standard of living. The guy you quoted in your piece on Paris (who says that Europe is finished) would get short shrift here.

    And Nancy - it's great to hear that this sort of thing is happening in the US too. All these points totally apply in America: the spectacular beauty of the landscapes (some of the points I made in my piece on Yellowstone), and the fact that most people already have far more than they need.

    ReplyDelete
  4. By the way, Simon, I don't "buy" into what John Naisbitt is on about. He's a guy who knows who butters his bread, and it's not the EU! More like the CCP! A lot of business oriented people come to China and get wined and dined and xiaojied (special massagee!)and become corrupted by the corruption, living it up in five star hotels and being treated to the overwhelming hospitality that the Chinese are so good at. I think it's easy for these people to lose touch with the other side of China, - the other 95% that is. Of course there's the other extreme, becoming a China-basher, and rejecting all the positives about China and its genuine progress.

    Personally, I see the slowness and tradition of Europe as a positive (mostly). My wife and LuLu (both Chinese) are really appreciating the cultural differences too.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As you say, the Chinese are expert at massaging Western egos (as well as other parts), while Europeans don't bother except for really high-level VIPS. Even B-list authors and businesspeople end up feeling like major celebs in China - no wonder they go home with such a glow. With attitudes like that, people are tragically easy to manipulate.

    ReplyDelete